CVE-2026-71889
HighCVSS 8.7Summary
In Bouncy Castle for Java before 1.86, both copies of PKIXCertPathReviewer (org.bouncycastle.pkix.jcajce and the legacy org.bouncycastle.x509) failed to apply X.509 name constraints to the end-entity certificate. The checkNameConstraints method walked the path with a loop bound excluding index zero (the target certificate), so the permitted and excluded subtree checks of RFC 5280 sec. 6.1.3 (b) and (c) never ran against the leaf's subject DN or subjectAltName. As a result, a chain whose leaf violated a NameConstraints extension imposed by its issuing CA was reported as valid (isValidCertPath() returned true with an empty error list), while CertPathValidator rejected the identical chain.
Risk Assessment
An application using the reviewer to make trust decisions (rather than for diagnostics alongside a real validation) could accept a certificate that the constrained CA was never authorized to issue. This could lead to security breaches, such as impersonation of a trusted entity or use of an unauthorized certificate in TLS communication.
Recommendation
Immediately update Bouncy Castle to version 1.86 or later (for the regular version), to 2.73.13 or later (for LTS), and for FIPS to bcpkix-fips 1.0.13, 2.0.13, or 2.1.13 (depending on the series). If an update is not possible, use CertPathValidator instead of PKIXCertPathReviewer for trust decisions.
Other vulnerabilities in Bouncy Castle
See all- CVE-2026-85515High
In Bouncy Castle for Java before 1.86, a vulnerability allows truncated OpenPGP encrypted messages to be accepted without error. On the SEIPD version 1 path, no integrity check is performed at all, and on the AEAD path (SEIPD v2 and v5), the trailing authentication tag is skipped, silently dropping packets after the literal. The issue also affects LTS before 2.73.13 and FIPS (BC-FJA) before specified versions, but only on the AEAD route.
- CVE-2026-71891High
In Bouncy Castle for Java before 1.86, BLS12_381BasicScheme.keyValidate accepted public keys built on a foreign ECC curve that merely shares BLS12-381's field characteristic. This allowed aggregate signatures to verify with a phantom signer, even without a signature for that key and message pair.
- CVE-2026-71886High
In Bouncy Castle for Java before 1.86, the high-level OpenPGP certificate API accepted third-party certifications or trust delegations from any component key of the issuing certificate, without requiring the component to have certification authority. An attacker could use a restricted subkey (e.g., signing-only or encryption-only) to issue a valid identity certification or trust delegation, which was then attributed to the primary key.
- CVE-2026-71883High
In Bouncy Castle for Java LTS before 2.73.13, the one-shot native packet ciphers for AES-CBC, CCM, CFB, CTR, GCM and GCM-SIV released the caller's key, IV and additional authenticated data arrays with JNI's ReleaseByteArrayElements in mode 0, which commits the native copy back into the Java array. When an application passed the same Java array as both input and destination (e.g., encrypting in place over KeyParameter.getKey()), the later mode-0 release wrote the unchanged key bytes over the ciphertext, exposing the raw AES key. The fix releases read-only input arrays with JNI_ABORT, preventing the copy-back.
- CVE-2026-71885Critical
In Bouncy Castle for Java before 1.86, the Messaging Layer Security (MLS, RFC 9420) implementation did not bind an X.509 credential to a LeafNode's signature_key. LeafNode.verify() checked a leaf's signature against the signature_key carried in the leaf itself, while the credential's X.509 certificate chain was stored but never parsed or validated, so the end-entity certificate's public key was never required to match signature_key as RFC 9420 sec. 5.3 requires. An attacker could present another party's certificate as its credential while signing the leaf, and the enclosing KeyPackage, with an unrelated key, and be accepted under that other party's identity through KeyPackage.verify() and the Group leaf-validation path.
- CVE-2026-58062Critical
In Bouncy Castle for Java before 1.85, a Stapled OCSP response is accepted without binding to the checked certificate. This issue also affects LTS before 2.73.12 and FIPS before 2.0.2 (2.0.X series) and 2.1.3 (2.1.X series).
- CVE-2026-8763Critical
In Bouncy Castle for Java before 1.85, Name Constraints can be bypassed via a trailing dot in rfc822Name and URI. This issue also affects LTS before 2.73.12 and FIPS before appropriate versions.
- CVE-2026-59650Critical
In Bouncy Castle for Java before 1.85, the MTI/A0 Diffie-Hellman key agreement exponentiates an unvalidated peer value. This issue also affects LTS before 2.73.12.
- CVE-2026-17508Medium
In Bouncy Castle for Java before 1.86, several password-based key derivation entry points ran the KDF with cost parameters taken from the untrusted input being processed, without bounding them, so a small input could dictate an arbitrary amount of work before any password or integrity check could reject it. The affected paths are the RFC 9579 PBMAC1 MAC calculator builders, the scrypt parallelization parameter p in the PKCS#8 and PKCS#12 cost guards, the raw JCA PBKDF2 provider, and the bcrypt round count read from an encrypted OpenSSH v1 private key's own kdfoptions. Each now bounds the parameter before deriving, in line with the caps already applied elsewhere in the tree, with the OpenSSH round count configurable through the new org.bouncycastle.openssh.max_rounds property. This completes the bounding begun in 1.85 for the PKCS#8 / PBES2 decryptors (CVE-2026-15055). This issue also affects Bouncy Castle for Java LTS before 2.73.13, and Bouncy Castle for Java FIPS (BC-FJA) before bcpkix-fips 1.0.13 (1.0.X series), 2.0.13 (2.0.X series) and 2.1.13 (2.1.X series).
- CVE-2026-14682High
In Bouncy Castle for Java before 1.85, a possible Out-of-Memory (OOM) condition exists due to unbounded up-front allocation on a definite-length read. This issue also affects LTS and FIPS versions.
Original NVD description (English source)
In Bouncy Castle for Java before 1.86, neither copy of PKIXCertPathReviewer - org.bouncycastle.pkix.jcajce.PKIXCertPathReviewer nor the legacy org.bouncycastle.x509.PKIXCertPathReviewer - applied X.509 name constraints to the end-entity certificate. checkNameConstraints walked the path with a loop bound of index greater than zero, which is the bound the CA-only steps require, but index zero is the target certificate under the standard CertPath ordering, so the permitted and excluded subtree checks of RFC 5280 sec. 6.1.3 (b) and (c) never ran against the leaf's subject DN or its subjectAltName. A chain whose leaf violated a NameConstraints extension imposed by its own issuing CA therefore reported isValidCertPath() true with an empty error list, while CertPathValidator.getInstance("PKIX", "BC"), which shares no code with the reviewer, rejected the identical chain against the identical trust anchor. An application using the reviewer to make the trust decision rather than for diagnostics alongside a real validation accepted a certificate the constrained CA was never authorised to issue. Both copies now check every certificate in the path including the target, waive the sec. 4.2.1.10 self-issued exemption for the final certificate as sec. 6.1.3 requires, and skip the sec. 6.1.4 (g) constraint-accumulation step for the target. This issue also affects Bouncy Castle for Java LTS before 2.73.13, which carries only the org.bouncycastle.pkix.jcajce copy of the reviewer. It also affects Bouncy Castle for Java FIPS (BC-FJA) before bcpkix-fips 1.0.13 (1.0.X series), 2.0.13 (2.0.X series) and 2.1.13 (2.1.X series).
Vulnerability data from NVD (NIST) · CISA KEV · EPSS