CVE-2026-34182
CriticalCVSS 9.1Exploitation Probability (EPSS)
Low risk15th percentile - higher than 15% of all known CVEs
Summary
The vulnerability in OpenSSL involves improper processing of AuthEnvelopedData containers in CMS, where insufficient validation of cipher and tag length fields allows an attacker to replace the cipher with an unauthenticated one (e.g., AES-256-OFB) or reduce the tag length to a single byte. This can lead to key-equivalent functionality for a chosen recipient and bypass of message integrity.
Risk Assessment
The organization is at risk of man-in-the-middle attacks where an attacker can decrypt or modify CMS messages, compromising data confidentiality and integrity. Applications trusting CMS_decrypt() may accept modified content, posing a risk for systems requiring strong authentication.
Recommendation
Immediately update OpenSSL to a patched version (e.g., 3.0.x or 1.1.1 with appropriate fix) and review applications using CMS for reliance on CMS_decrypt() for integrity validation. Until the update, temporarily disable AuthEnvelopedData support or implement additional authentication mechanisms.
Other vulnerabilities in OpenSSL
See all- CVE-2026-84784High
A malicious remote peer can flood the local QUIC stack with NEW_CONNECTION_ID frames by bypassing a limit on connection IDs. This causes RETIRE_CONN_ID frames to be sent and, with withheld ACKs, can allocate about 400 MB of memory.
- CVE-2026-84783High
OpenSSL 4.0 contains a use-after-free vulnerability (CWE-416) in the caching of X.509 certificate extensions. When several threads concurrently use the same certificate for the first time, one thread may free the cached extension data while another thread is still using it. This can crash the process, resulting in a Denial of Service.
- CVE-2026-84782High
The DTLS retransmission logic incorrectly handles a handshake message write that is suspended part-way through. The retransmitted message can be read past the message buffer, disclosing heap memory or causing a crash and Denial of Service.
- CVE-2026-77696Low
SM2 signature generation uses non-constant-time arithmetic on secret values, forming a timing side-channel. An attacker able to measure SM2 signing times may learn information about the per-signature secret nonce, which over many signatures can lead to recovery of the private key. Applications performing SM2 signature generation are affected on all platforms.
- CVE-2026-75806Medium
An established DTLS 1.2 association using an AEAD cipher suite can be terminated by a single unauthenticated datagram whose encrypted fragment is shorter than the mandatory explicit IV and authentication tag overhead. The record layer passes the record length to the cipher before checking it is long enough, causing an internal error instead of treating the record as failed authentication.
- CVE-2026-75805Medium
A NULL pointer dereference vulnerability in the OpenSSL CMP client. When a client requests certificate revocation based on a PKCS#10 CSR and the server returns a specially crafted certificate name in its response, the client reads from a NULL pointer and crashes. Only clients that identify the certificate via CSR (e.g. 'openssl cmp -cmd rr -csr' or OSSL_CMP_exec_RR_ses() with OSSL_CMP_CTX_set1_p10CSR()) are affected.
- CVE-2026-75804Medium
The OpenSSL QUIC stack does not enforce connection-level flow control for streams. A malicious remote peer can send more bytes as long as they fit within stream flow control limits, leading to excessive memory allocation.
- CVE-2026-72897High
A TLS server that calls SSL_set_SSL_CTX() to switch a connection to a different SSL_CTX part way through a handshake may access memory beyond the end of an internal array if the replacement context knows about more provider signature algorithms than the context the connection was created from. A remote peer may be able to cause a small out-of-bounds read, and in some circumstances a fixed-value out-of-bounds write, on the server heap, potentially leading to a Denial of Service.
- CVE-2026-54875Low
OpenSSL's optimized scalar point multiplication implementation for SM2 private key operations on ARM64 and RISC-V platforms is not constant-time. Conditional branches and table lookups depend on the bits of the secret scalar, so execution time and cache-access patterns leak information about the private key or signature nonce.
- CVE-2026-54872Low
The generic elliptic-curve scalar multiplication used for ECDSA and SM2 signature operations with curves lacking a dedicated implementation leaks information about the secret nonce through timing. An attacker measuring signing times may learn the nonce, which over many signatures can lead to private key recovery.
Original NVD description (English source)
Issue Summary: Cryptographic Message Services (CMS) processing fails to perform sufficient input validation on the cipher and tag length fields of AuthEnvelopedData containers, leading to various potential compromises. Impact Summary: Attackers making use of these vulnerabilities may achieve key-equivalent functionality for a given CMS recipient and/or bypass integrity validation for a given message. In one use case, an attacker may send a CMS message containing AuthEnvelopedData with the cipher specified as a non-AEAD cipher. OpenSSL erroneously allows this selection, and attempts to decrypt and validate the message. An on-path attacker who captures one legitimate AES-GCM AuthEnvelopedData addressed to the victim can re-emit it with the recipientInfos set left byte-for-byte intact, so the victim's private key still unwraps the genuine CEK (the content-encryption key), but with the inner OID rewritten to AES-256-OFB (Output Feedback Mode, an unauthenticated keystream mode) and with an attacker-chosen IV and ciphertext. The victim initializes AES-256-OFB under the real CEK, never consults the MAC field, and CMS_decrypt() returns success. If the application under attack responds to the attacker with any indicator showing success or failure of the decryption effort, it is possible for the attacker to use this as an oracle to obtain key equivalent functionality for the CEK used for the chosen recipient of the message. In another use case, an attacker can reduce the tag length of the chosen AEAD cipher for a given AuthEnvelopedData container to be a single byte long, allowing an attacker to brute force CMS decryption, producing an integrity bypass for applications that trust CMS_decrypt() to reject modified content. The FIPS modules are not affected by this issue.
Vulnerability data from NVD (NIST) · CISA KEV · EPSS

