CVE-2026-113733
LowCVSS 2.2Exploitation Probability (EPSS)
Low risk34th percentile - higher than 34% of all known CVEs
Summary
In Django 6.1 before 6.1.3 and 6.0 before 6.0.10, django.contrib.admin.utils.display_for_field() did not obfuscate the password field of user models other than AUTH_USER_MODEL, or of an AUTH_USER_MODEL inheriting its password field from a concrete parent model through multi-table inheritance. This allows authenticated staff users with only the view permission on such a model to obtain full password hashes via the read-only change form.
Risk Assessment
A staff user with minimal view permission can obtain password hashes, enabling offline password attacks and privilege escalation. The risk affects Django installations with custom user models or multi-table inheritance.
Recommendation
Upgrade Django to 6.1.3, 6.0.10, or later. Check whether the project uses custom user models or multi-table inheritance, and restrict staff permissions to the minimum necessary.
Other vulnerabilities in Django
See all- CVE-2026-87975Medium
In Django 6.1 before 6.1.2, 6.0 before 6.0.9, and 5.2 before 5.2.18, the function django.forms.models.BaseModelFormSet.save_existing_objects() used the presence of a primary key on a submitted form's instance as evidence that the instance belonged to the formset's limiting queryset. An object outside that queryset can be deleted by an authenticated user without permission on the targeted object, via forged management-form data. Models using the default AutoField primary key are not affected.
- CVE-2026-87890Medium
In Django 6.1 before 6.1.2, 6.0 before 6.0.9, and 5.2 before 5.2.18, an incomplete fix for CVE-2026-15307 in Django spatial lookups allows an attacker who can supply bytes values to cause the Django process to make network requests via a crafted VRT document referencing an external raster source.
- CVE-2026-84429Medium
In Django 6.1 before 6.1.2, 6.0 before 6.0.9, and 5.2 before 5.2.18, the function django.utils.http.parse_header_parameters() is subject to a potential denial-of-service attack due to quadratic time complexity when parsing a value with many separators inside a quoted parameter. An unauthenticated request could reach this parsing through headers such as Accept or Content-Type.
- CVE-2026-77050Medium
In Django 6.1 before 6.1.2, 6.0 before 6.0.9, and 5.2 before 5.2.18, the function django.utils.translation.get_supported_language_variant() is subject to a potential denial-of-service attack when processing many distinct, very long language codes, which are retained as keys in an in-memory cache and consume process memory.
- CVE-2016-9014High
Django versions before 1.8.16, 1.9.11, and 1.10.3, when DEBUG is enabled, allow remote attackers to conduct DNS rebinding attacks due to failure to validate the HTTP Host header against ALLOWED_HOSTS.
- CVE-2016-7401High
The cookie parsing code in Django before 1.8.15 and 1.9.x before 1.9.10, when used on a site with Google Analytics, allows remote attackers to bypass an intended CSRF protection mechanism by setting arbitrary cookies.
- CVE-2016-2512High
The utils.http.is_safe_url function in Django before 1.8.10 and 1.9.x before 1.9.3 allows remote attackers to redirect users to arbitrary web sites. This can lead to phishing attacks or potentially cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks via a URL containing basic authentication.
- CVE-2015-5143High
Django versions before 1.4.21, 1.5.x through 1.6.x, 1.7.x before 1.7.9, and 1.8.x before 1.8.3 are vulnerable to denial of service attacks. Attackers can exploit unique session keys to consume session store resources.
- CVE-2014-0474High
In Django versions before 1.4.11, 1.5.x before 1.5.6, 1.6.x before 1.6.3, and 1.7.x before 1.7 beta 2, the FilePathField, GenericIPAddressField, and IPAddressField model field classes do not properly perform type conversion. This may allow remote attackers to have unspecified impact related to 'MySQL typecasting.'
- CVE-2026-1207Medium
In Django 6.0 before 6.0.2, 5.2 before 5.2.11, and 4.2 before 4.2.28, a vulnerability was found in raster lookups on RasterField (PostGIS only). Remote attackers can inject SQL via the band index parameter.
Original NVD description (English source)
An issue was discovered in Django 6.1 before 6.1.3 and 6.0 before 6.0.10. The `django.contrib.admin.utils.display_for_field()` function did not obfuscate the password field of user models other than `AUTH_USER_MODEL`, or of an `AUTH_USER_MODEL` inheriting its password field from a concrete parent model through multi-table inheritance, which allows authenticated staff users with only the view permission on such a model to obtain full password hashes via the read-only change form. Earlier, unsupported Django series (such as 5.1.x, 5.0.x, and 4.2.x) were not evaluated and may also be affected. Django would like to thank Aaron chen for reporting this issue.
Vulnerability data from NVD (NIST) · CISA KEV · EPSS

