CVE Catalog

CVE-2026-98134

Unknown
Published: Translated: NVD NIST

Summary

A vulnerability in the Linux kernel BPF verifier allows it to incorrectly infer that a pointer is non-null. The bug occurs when comparing two pointers where one has a type without the PTR_MAYBE_NULL flag but can still be NULL at runtime. As a result, the verifier fails to catch a null pointer dereference, potentially leading to a crash or unauthorized code execution.

Risk Assessment

This flaw may allow a local attacker to bypass the BPF verifier and trigger a kernel crash (denial of service) or potentially execute code in kernel context. It affects systems with BPF enabled and the ability for unprivileged users to load BPF programs.

Recommendation

Update the Linux kernel to a version containing the fix (commit replacing type_may_be_null() with reg_not_null()). If updating is not possible, restrict the ability for unprivileged users to load BPF programs.

Other vulnerabilities in Linux kernel

See all
Original NVD description (English source)

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: bpf: check_cond_jmp_op(): properly infer if register is null Nicholas Carlini reported a bug when verifier can incorrectly infer that a pointer is non-null. The bug occurs when two pointers are compared and one of them has a type w/o PTR_MAYBE_NULL flag, but which allows a value to be NULL at runtime. Here is an example: // `a` is PTR_TO_MEM | MEM_RDONLY | PTR_UNTRUSTED // `a` is 0 at runtime. // `b` is PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE | PTR_MAYBE_NULL void *a = bpf_rdonly_cast(0, 0); int *b = bpf_map_lookup_elem(...); if (a == b) *b = 42; // verifier does not catch null pointer dereference This happens because of a special case in check_cond_jmp_op(), which attempts to strip PTR_MAYBE_NULL flags from pointer types, when processing comparisons like `rA == rB`, if either rA or rB can't be null. The non-null property is derived based on the absence of PTR_MAYBE_NULL flag on rA's or rB's type. But that is not sufficient for types like PTR_TO_MEM, as in the example. This patch replaces type_may_be_null() call with reg_not_null(), which contains an allowlist of types for which absence of PTR_MAYBE_NULL actually means that the value can't be NULL at runtime. At the moment, the list in the reg_not_null() omits two types for which PTR_MAYBE_NULL is applicable: PTR_TO_XDP_SOCK and PTR_TO_BUF. In order to remain backward compatible, and assuming that only comparison between pointers of the same type makes sense, this commit extends reg_not_null(). W/o such an extension e.g. verifier_jeq_infer_not_null/null_ptr_to_map_value fails. reg_not_null() can be extended further, but I deem that out of scope for the fix at hand. Explicit base_type(...) != PTR_TO_BTF_ID checks in the check_cond_jmp_op() can be removed with migration to reg_not_null(), but that is a behavioural change, as the special case would start matching for PTR_TO_BTF_ID that is also is_trusted_reg(). I omit the behavioural change from this commit.

Vulnerability data from NVD (NIST) · CISA KEV · EPSS