CVE-2026-59249
MediumCVSS 6.3Summary
A vulnerability in the Mint library (versions 0.1.0 through 1.9.2) allows HTTP response smuggling by accepting a plus/minus sign in the chunk-size line of Transfer-Encoding: chunked. A malicious HTTP/1 server can exploit this interpretation mismatch to poison the response queue on a shared keep-alive connection, causing subsequent requests to receive forged responses.
Risk Assessment
An attacker can inject malicious data into HTTP responses that the Mint client attributes to other unrelated requests. This can lead to data theft, session integrity compromise, or unauthorized actions performed in the victim's context.
Recommendation
Upgrade the Mint library to version 1.9.3 or later immediately. If an upgrade is not possible, temporarily disable keep-alive connections or use an RFC-compliant intermediary proxy.
Other vulnerabilities in Mint
See all- CVE-2026-59246Medium
A vulnerability in the Mint library for Elixir allows a remote HTTP/2 server to exhaust client memory by sending an infinite stream of zero-length CONTINUATION frames. The header accumulation mechanism lacks proper protection against this attack, leading to denial of service (DoS).
- CVE-2026-58229High
A vulnerability in the Mint library for Elixir allows a remote HTTP server to exhaust client memory and cause a denial of service (DoS). The HTTP header decoding functions accumulate headers without limits, and the parser has no cap on the number or size of headers, enabling an attacker to stream infinite header lines without a terminating blank line.
- CVE-2026-56810High
A vulnerability in the Mint library (Mint.HTTP1 module) allows a remote server to exhaust client memory by sending a chunked transfer-encoded response with a declared huge chunk size (e.g., 2 GiB) and slowly sending data without ever completing the chunk. The client buffers all received bytes without emitting them to the caller, leading to uncontrolled memory growth and out-of-memory conditions.
- CVE-2026-49754High
A vulnerability in the Mint library for Elixir allows an attacker-controlled HTTP/2 server to exhaust client memory via a CONTINUATION frame flood. There is no limit on the header accumulator size, leading to memory exhaustion and BEAM process death.
- CVE-2026-49753Medium
Elixir Mint library before version 1.9.0 is vulnerable to HTTP response smuggling. The Content-Length parser accepts + and - signs, violating RFC 7230. An attacker-controlled HTTP/1 server can desynchronize response framing on shared connections.
- CVE-2026-48862High
A vulnerability in the Mint library for Elixir allows an attacker-controlled HTTP/2 server to exhaust client memory via PUSH_PROMISE flooding. The server can create an unlimited number of stream entries without checking the max_concurrent_streams limit, leading to memory exhaustion.
- CVE-2026-48861Low
Improper Neutralization of CRLF Sequences ('CRLF Injection') vulnerability in elixir-mint Mint allows HTTP Request Splitting and HTTP Request Smuggling. In lib/mint/http1/request.ex, the encode_request_line/2 function splices the caller-supplied method and target arguments directly into the HTTP/1 request line without any character validation. An application that forwards attacker-controlled input as the HTTP method or target to Mint.HTTP.request/5 is therefore exposed to request-line CRLF injection. Mint 1.7.0 introduced validate_request_target/2, which rejects CRLF and other control characters in the target by default, but the method field remains unvalidated.
Original NVD description (English source)
Inconsistent interpretation of HTTP requests (HTTP response smuggling) vulnerability in elixir-mint mint allows a malicious HTTP/1 server to desynchronize a strict intermediary and the Mint client on the same pooled connection, enabling response-queue poisoning against subsequent requests that share the connection. The Mint.HTTP1.decode_body/5 function in lib/mint/http1.ex parses the chunk-size line of a Transfer-Encoding: chunked response with Integer.parse(data, 16). RFC 7230 defines chunk-size = 1*HEXDIG and forbids any sign prefix, but Integer.parse/2 accepts an optional leading + or -. A chunk-size line of +5 is accepted as a five-byte chunk; lines of +0 and -0 are accepted as the terminating zero-length chunk and end the message body early. An RFC-strict intermediary in the response path rejects these forms, so the intermediary and the Mint client disagree on where one response ends and the next begins. On a pooled keep-alive connection, an attacker-influenced origin can inject bytes that the client attributes to the next legitimate response on the same connection, poisoning the response queue and corrupting the responses returned to unrelated in-flight requests. This issue affects mint: from 0.1.0 before 1.9.3.