CVE-2026-58222
HighCVSS 8.8Summary
A vulnerability in Samba Active Directory Domain Controller (AD DC) combines LDAP filter injection with improper authorization checks, allowing an authenticated low-privilege domain user to disclose confidential AD attributes such as msKds-RootKeyData, potentially leading to privilege escalation and full domain compromise.
Risk Assessment
An attacker could gain access to sensitive credential data, including gMSA passwords, potentially leading to complete takeover of the Active Directory domain.
Recommendation
It is recommended to immediately update Samba to a patched version and implement additional monitoring of LDAP queries.
Other vulnerabilities in Samba
See all- CVE-2017-15275High
Samba before 4.7.3 might allow remote attackers to obtain sensitive information by leveraging failure of the server to clear allocated heap memory.
- CVE-2016-2119High
In Samba library versions 4.x before 4.2.14, 4.3.x before 4.3.11, and 4.4.x before 4.4.5, a vulnerability allows man-in-the-middle attackers to bypass a client-signing protection mechanism. This enables spoofing of SMB2 and SMB3 servers.
- CVE-2016-2113High
Samba versions 4.x before 4.2.11, 4.3.x before 4.3.8, and 4.4.x before 4.4.2 do not verify X.509 certificates from TLS servers, allowing man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof LDAPS and HTTPS servers and obtain sensitive information via a crafted certificate.
- CVE-2015-8467High
The samldb_check_user_account_control_acl function in Samba 4.x before 4.1.22, 4.2.x before 4.2.7, and 4.3.x before 4.3.3 does not properly check for administrative privileges during the creation of machine accounts. This allows remote authenticated users to bypass intended access restrictions.
- CVE-2015-5252High
In Samba versions 3.x and 4.x before 4.1.22, 4.2.x before 4.2.7, and 4.3.x before 4.3.3, a vulnerability allows remote attackers to bypass intended file-access restrictions via a symlink pointing outside of a share when certain substring relationships in share names exist.
- CVE-2015-0240High
The Netlogon server implementation in smbd in Samba 3.5.x and 3.6.x before 3.6.25, 4.0.x before 4.0.25, 4.1.x before 4.1.17, and 4.2.x before 4.2.0rc5 performs a free operation on an uninitialized stack pointer, allowing remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via crafted Netlogon packets.
- CVE-2014-8143High
Samba versions 4.0.x before 4.0.24, 4.1.x before 4.1.16, and 4.2.x before 4.2rc4, when an Active Directory Domain Controller (AD DC) is configured, allow remote authenticated users to set the LDB userAccountControl UF_SERVER_TRUST_ACCOUNT bit, consequently gaining privileges.
- CVE-2026-58221Medium
A low-privilege authenticated Samba AD user can modify internal LDB special DNs via LDAP access, enabling a domain takeover.
- CVE-2026-4408Critical
A flaw in Samba allows remote command execution due to improper escaping of shell meta-characters in the 'check password script' feature when using the %u substitution. This affects non-standard configurations with samba-dcerpcd running as a system service.
- CVE-2026-4480Critical
The Samba printing subsystem contains a vulnerability where the client-controlled job description string is passed to the command configured with the 'print command' setting via the '%J' substitution character without escaping shell meta characters. A remote attacker can send a specially crafted print job description containing unescaped shell characters, leading to remote code execution.
Original NVD description (English source)
A security flaw combining LDAP filter injection and improper authorization checks was found in Samba Active Directory Domain Controller (AD DC). When processing LDAP Compare requests, Samba fails to properly validate user-supplied attribute names and executes the resulting internal database search in a trusted context, bypassing normal Access Control List (ACL) enforcement. An authenticated low-privilege domain user can exploit these flaws to disclose confidential Active Directory attributes that would normally be inaccessible. The disclosed information may be leveraged to derive sensitive authentication material, potentially leading to privilege escalation and complete domain compromise. For example: In deployments configured with Group Managed Service Accounts (gMSAs), an attacker can extract the "msKds-RootKeyData" attribute and derive gMSA passwords offline, potentially leading to complete domain compromise if privileged gMSAs are present.