CVE Catalog

CVE-2026-53331

MediumCVSS 5.5
Published: Updated: Translated: NVD NIST

Exploitation Probability (EPSS)

Low risk
0.12%

2th percentile - higher than 2% of all known CVEs

Summary

In the Qualcomm slimbus driver (qcom-ngd-ctrl), a potential deadlock was detected due to an ABBA locking order between tx_lock and ctrl->lock. During SSR/PDR down notification, tx_lock is acquired before ctrl->lock, while other code paths take them in reverse order, leading to a possible system hang.

Risk Assessment

The deadlock can cause system hang or slimbus driver failure, affecting devices communicating over this bus (e.g., audio, sensors). A local attacker could exploit this vulnerability to cause a denial of service (DoS) by triggering the SSR/PDR procedure.

Recommendation

Immediately update the Linux kernel to a version containing the fix that removes unnecessary tx_lock acquisition in qcom_slim_ngd_ssr_pdr_notify(). Follow security advisories from your distribution and apply the appropriate patch.

Other vulnerabilities in Linux kernel

See all
Original NVD description (English source)

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: slimbus: qcom-ngd-ctrl: Avoid ABBA on tx_lock/ctrl->lock During the SSR/PDR down notification the tx_lock is taken with the intent to provide synchronization with active DMA transfers. But during this period qcom_slim_ngd_down() is invoked, which ends up in slim_report_absent(), which takes the slim_controller lock. In multiple other codepaths these two locks are taken in the opposite order (i.e. slim_controller then tx_lock). The result is a lockdep splat, and a possible deadlock: rprocctl/449 is trying to acquire lock: ffff00009793e620 (&ctrl->lock){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: slim_report_absent (drivers/slimbus/core.c:322) slimbus but task is already holding lock: ffff00009793fb50 (&ctrl->tx_lock){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: qcom_slim_ngd_ssr_pdr_notify (drivers/slimbus/qcom-ngd-ctrl.c:1475) slim_qcom_ngd_ctrl which lock already depends on the new lock. Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&ctrl->tx_lock); lock(&ctrl->lock); lock(&ctrl->tx_lock); lock(&ctrl->lock); The assumption is that the comment refers to the desire to not call qcom_slim_ngd_exit_dma() while we have an ongoing DMA TX transaction. But any such transaction is initiated and completed within a single qcom_slim_ngd_xfer_msg(). Prior to calling qcom_slim_ngd_exit_dma() the slim_controller is torn down, all child devices are notified that the slimbus is gone and the child devices are removed. Stop taking the tx_lock in qcom_slim_ngd_ssr_pdr_notify() to avoid the deadlock.

Vulnerability data from NVD (NIST) · CISA KEV · EPSS