CVE Catalog

CVE-2026-48084

HighCVSS 7.4
Published: Updated: Translated: NVD NIST

Exploitation Probability (EPSS)

Low risk
0.36%

29th percentile - higher than 29% of all known CVEs

Summary

OpenReception before version 1.0.2 does not throttle failed passphrase login attempts. An attacker can submit unlimited wrong passphrase guesses against any known email address, at a rate of about 10 attempts per second. The lack of throttling in the passphrase branch, while the WebAuthn endpoint has throttling, enables brute-force and dictionary attacks on user accounts. The issue is fixed in version 1.0.2.

Risk Assessment

User accounts, especially with weak passwords, are at risk of takeover, potentially leading to unauthorized access to sensitive data.

Recommendation

Update OpenReception to version 1.0.2 or later. Additionally, enforce strong passwords and enable additional protection mechanisms such as account lockout.

Other vulnerabilities in OpenReception

See all
Original NVD description (English source)

OpenReception's appointment booking software provides an end-to-end encrypted appointment booking platform. Versions prior to 1.0.2 don't throttle failed passphrase login attempts. An attacker can submit unlimited wrong passphrase guesses against any known email address, capped only by the Argon2 verification cost (about 100 milliseconds per attempt on the tested host, giving 10 attempts per second sustained). The same backend implements a working per-account throttle on the WebAuthn challenge endpoint, which returns HTTP 429 after roughly 19 attempts. The passphrase branch simply does not invoke that throttle, leaving a supported high-value login path unprotected against credential stuffing and dictionary attacks. The asymmetry confirms this is an oversight rather than a design choice. The throttle infrastructure exists, is wired into the same auth backend, and works on the WebAuthn path. The passphrase branch in `/api/auth/login` was not updated to record failed attempts. Combined with the application's minimum-passphrase policy (12 characters, no entropy or dictionary checks), accounts using common base patterns such as `Spring2026!XX` or words from a leak corpus are realistically reachable in days on a single CPU, hours on a small GPU farm. Version 1.0.2 patches the issue.

Vulnerability data from NVD (NIST) · CISA KEV · EPSS