CVE Catalog

CVE-2026-48080

HighCVSS 8.0
Published: Updated: Translated: NVD NIST

Exploitation Probability (EPSS)

Low risk
0.28%

20th percentile - higher than 20% of all known CVEs

Summary

OpenReception before version 1.0.2 exposes the full tenant record via `GET /api/tenants/{id}` to any authenticated TENANT_ADMIN, including the `databaseUrl` field with the live PostgreSQL connection string. In the default docker-compose deployment, this string contains the `postgres` superuser with plaintext password, allowing full access to all databases managed by that PostgreSQL instance.

Risk Assessment

A tenant admin can read, modify, or delete data of all other tenants, including encrypted appointments, key shares, metadata, and the central user table with password hashes and sessions. They can also escalate privileges inside the database container, completely breaking cross-tenant isolation.

Recommendation

Update OpenReception to version 1.0.2 or later immediately. If updating is not possible, restrict access to the `GET /api/tenants/{id}` endpoint and consider using a less privileged PostgreSQL user for application connections.

Other vulnerabilities in OpenReception

See all
Original NVD description (English source)

OpenReception's appointment booking software provides an end-to-end encrypted appointment booking platform. Prior to version 1.0.2, the `GET /api/tenants/{id}` endpoint returns the full tenant record to any authenticated `TENANT_ADMIN` of that tenant, including the `databaseUrl` field. This field contains the live PostgreSQL connection string the application uses to connect to that tenant's database. In the tested official `docker-compose.prod.yml` deployment, the connection string contained the user `postgres` with `rolsuper=true` and the plaintext password from `secrets/postgres_password.txt`. Operators who configure a non-superuser PostgreSQL user via `secrets/postgres_user.txt` would expose a less privileged credential, but the disclosure of the connection string itself is independent of that choice. The same credential applies to every database managed by that PostgreSQL instance: the central `appointment_booking` database, every per-tenant database (one per tenant), and the postgres administrative database. A `TENANT_ADMIN` of one tenant who can reach `postgres:5432` (directly via internal network, indirectly via any SSRF, RCE, or file-read in the application) can read every other tenant's appointment ciphertexts, key shares, and metadata; read the central user table, including all `GLOBAL_ADMIN` accounts, password hashes, and session records; modify or delete any data in any tenant database; and/or i a superuser-scoped deployment: use PostgreSQL's `pg_read_server_files`, `COPY ... FROM PROGRAM`, and `CREATE EXTENSION` for further escalation inside the database container. This breaks the per-tenant database isolation that is otherwise the primary cross-tenant control in the application. The application code carefully scopes most queries to the calling tenant's database, but those scopings are irrelevant once the attacker holds the credentials that bypass the application entirely. Version 1.0.2 fixes the issue.

Vulnerability data from NVD (NIST) · CISA KEV · EPSS