CVE Catalog

CVE-2026-46560

HighCVSS 7.5
Published: Updated: Translated: NVD NIST

Exploitation Probability (EPSS)

Low risk
0.19%

8th percentile - higher than 8% of all known CVEs

Summary

In OpenAM before 16.1.1, the RADIUS authentication module opens an unconnected datagram socket and trusts the first UDP datagram received on the client source port. The receive path does not verify the source IP and port, match the response identifier to the outstanding request, or verify the RFC 2865 Response Authenticator; the RFC 2869 Message-Authenticator is neither sent nor required. Any non-Reject/non-Challenge packet is treated as success, so an attacker can race the real server or spray forged Access-Accept packets and obtain a session for any RADIUS-mapped username without knowing the shared secret.

Risk Assessment

An unauthenticated network attacker can impersonate any RADIUS-mapped user and obtain a session with that principal's privileges. This results in full authentication bypass on the login chain.

Recommendation

Upgrade OpenAM to version 16.1.1 or later. Until patched, consider disabling the RADIUS module in login chains or restricting network access to the RADIUS server.

Other vulnerabilities in OpenAM

See all
Original NVD description (English source)

Open Access Management (OpenAM) is an access management solution. Prior to 16.1.1, the `RADIUS` authentication module opens an unconnected datagram socket and trusts the first UDP datagram received on the client source port. The receive path does not verify the source IP and port, match the response identifier to the outstanding request, or verify the RFC 2865 `Response Authenticator`; the RFC 2869 `Message-Authenticator` is neither sent nor required. Any non-Reject/non-Challenge packet is treated as success. On a deployment with a `RADIUS` module instance enabled on a login chain, an unauthenticated network attacker can race the real server on-path or spray forged `Access-Accept` packets off-path and obtain a session for any `RADIUS`-mapped username without knowing the shared secret. Unlike CVE-2024-3596, exploitation requires no MD5 chosen-prefix forgery because no response authenticator is checked. The resulting session carries the impersonated principal's privileges. This issue is fixed in version 16.1.1.

Vulnerability data from NVD (NIST) · CISA KEV · EPSS