CVE Catalog

CVE-2026-32875

HighCVSS 7.5
Published: Updated: Translated: NVD NIST

Exploitation Probability (EPSS)

Low risk
0.47%

38th percentile - higher than 38% of all known CVEs

Summary

UltraJSON versions 5.10 through 5.11.0 are vulnerable to buffer overflow or infinite loop via large indent handling. ujson.dumps() crashes the Python interpreter (segmentation fault) when the product of the indent parameter and nested depth exceeds INT32_MAX, or may get stuck in an infinite loop if indent is a large negative number. Both are caused by integer overflow/underflow during memory calculation for indentation and can lead to denial of service.

Risk Assessment

The organization is at risk of DoS attacks if a service using UltraJSON allows untrusted users to control the indent parameter without restricting it to small non-negative values. This can crash or hang the application, disrupting service availability.

Recommendation

Immediately upgrade UltraJSON to version 5.12.0 or later. If an upgrade is not possible, restrict the indent parameter to small non-negative values (e.g., 0-8) and do not accept it from untrusted sources.

Other vulnerabilities in UltraJSON

Original NVD description (English source)

UltraJSON is a fast JSON encoder and decoder written in pure C with bindings for Python 3.7+. Versions 5.10 through 5.11.0 are vulnerable to buffer overflow or infinite loop through large indent handling. ujson.dumps() crashes the Python interpreter (segmentation fault) when the product of the indent parameter and the nested depth of the input exceeds INT32_MAX. It can also get stuck in an infinite loop if the indent is a large negative number. Both are caused by an integer overflow/underflow whilst calculating how much memory to reserve for indentation. And both can be used to achieve denial of service. To be vulnerable, a service must call ujson.dump()/ujson.dumps()/ujson.encode() whilst giving untrusted users control over the indent parameter and not restrict that indentation to reasonably small non-negative values. A service may also be vulnerable to the infinite loop if it uses a fixed negative indent. An underflow always occurs for any negative indent when the input data is at least one level nested but, for small negative indents, the underflow is usually accidentally rectified by another overflow. This issue has been fixed in version 5.12.0.

Vulnerability data from NVD (NIST) · CISA KEV · EPSS