CVE-2026-15920
MediumCVSS 6.1Exploitation Probability (EPSS)
Low risk23th percentile - higher than 23% of all known CVEs
Summary
An issue was discovered in Django 5.2 before 5.2.17 and 6.0 before 6.0.8. django.contrib.admin.utils.display_for_field() renders URLField values as clickable links in the admin without validating the URL. A value stored with an unsafe scheme is displayed as a link on changelist and read-only admin pages, which allows cross-site scripting against staff users who click the link. Exploitation requires the unsafe value to already be stored in the database. URLField validation through a ModelForm or the admin rejects unsafe schemes, so this affects applications that persist URLField data without running model validation, for example through direct queryset writes, deserialization, or bulk import of untrusted input.
Risk Assessment
The risk involves potential script execution in the context of administrative staff, potentially leading to session theft, unauthorized actions, or further system compromise.
Recommendation
It is recommended to update Django to version 5.2.17 or 6.0.8. Also, ensure that URLField data is validated before being stored in the database.
Other vulnerabilities in Django
See all- CVE-2016-9014High
Django versions before 1.8.16, 1.9.11, and 1.10.3, when DEBUG is enabled, allow remote attackers to conduct DNS rebinding attacks due to failure to validate the HTTP Host header against ALLOWED_HOSTS.
- CVE-2016-7401High
The cookie parsing code in Django before 1.8.15 and 1.9.x before 1.9.10, when used on a site with Google Analytics, allows remote attackers to bypass an intended CSRF protection mechanism by setting arbitrary cookies.
- CVE-2016-2512High
The utils.http.is_safe_url function in Django before 1.8.10 and 1.9.x before 1.9.3 allows remote attackers to redirect users to arbitrary web sites. This can lead to phishing attacks or potentially cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks via a URL containing basic authentication.
- CVE-2015-5143High
Django versions before 1.4.21, 1.5.x through 1.6.x, 1.7.x before 1.7.9, and 1.8.x before 1.8.3 are vulnerable to denial of service attacks. Attackers can exploit unique session keys to consume session store resources.
- CVE-2014-0474High
In Django versions before 1.4.11, 1.5.x before 1.5.6, 1.6.x before 1.6.3, and 1.7.x before 1.7 beta 2, the FilePathField, GenericIPAddressField, and IPAddressField model field classes do not properly perform type conversion. This may allow remote attackers to have unspecified impact related to 'MySQL typecasting.'
- CVE-2026-5766Medium
An issue was discovered in versions 6.0 before 6.0.5 and 5.2 before 5.2.14 related to ASGI requests that can bypass the `FILE_UPLOAD_MAX_MEMORY_SIZE` limit when the `Content-Length` header is missing or understated. This may lead to large files being loaded into memory, causing service degradation.
- CVE-2026-35192Low
An issue was discovered in versions 6.0 before 6.0.5 and 5.2 before 5.2.14 regarding response headers that do not vary on cookies if a session is not modified, while `SESSION_SAVE_EVERY_REQUEST` is set to `True`. A remote attacker can steal a user's session after that user visits a cached public page.
- CVE-2026-1207Medium
In Django 6.0 before 6.0.2, 5.2 before 5.2.11, and 4.2 before 4.2.28, a vulnerability was found in raster lookups on RasterField (PostGIS only). Remote attackers can inject SQL via the band index parameter.
- CVE-2016-9013Critical
Django versions 1.8.x before 1.8.16, 1.9.x before 1.9.11, and 1.10.x before 1.10.3 use a hardcoded password for a temporary database user, making it easier for remote attackers to gain access to the database server.
- CVE-2026-15830Medium
In Django 5.2 before 5.2.17 and 6.0 before 6.0.8, an issue was discovered in GeoDjango where parsing deeply nested GEOMETRYCOLLECTION objects (as WKT, WKB, or hex-WKB) can lead to unbounded recursion and a segmentation fault in the GEOS library, potentially causing denial of service. Spatial field lookups and the GeometryField form field are also affected.
Original NVD description (English source)
An issue was discovered in Django 5.2 before 5.2.17 and 6.0 before 6.0.8. `django.contrib.admin.utils.display_for_field()` renders `URLField` values as clickable links in the admin without validating the URL. A value stored with an unsafe scheme is displayed as a link on changelist and read-only admin pages, which allows cross-site scripting against staff users who click the link. Exploitation requires the unsafe value to already be stored in the database. `URLField` validation through a `ModelForm` or the admin rejects unsafe schemes, so this affects applications that persist `URLField` data without running model validation, for example through direct queryset writes, deserialization, or bulk import of untrusted input. Django would like to thank Egor Saltykov for reporting this issue.