CVE-2025-54550
HighSummary
Przykład example_xcom zawarty w dokumentacji Airflow implementował niebezpieczny wzorzec odczytu wartości z XCom, co mogło być wykorzystane przez użytkowników interfejsu do wykonania dowolnego kodu na pracowniku. Jest to podatność o niskim stopniu zagrożenia, ponieważ użytkownicy interfejsu są już wysoko zaufani.
Risk Assessment
Choć podatność nie wpływa na wydanie Airflow, użytkownicy, którzy zastosowali ten wzorzec, mogą być narażeni na ryzyko wykonania nieautoryzowanego kodu. W przypadku wykorzystania tego wzorca w środowisku produkcyjnym, może to prowadzić do poważnych konsekwencji bezpieczeństwa.
Recommendation
Zaleca się, aby użytkownicy, którzy zastosowali ten wzorzec, dostosowali swoje implementacje zgodnie z poprawioną wersją przykładu zawartą w dokumentacji Airflow 3.2.0.
Related vulnerabilities
- CVE-2026-78159Critical
The Events Calendar plugin for WordPress in all versions up to and including 6.17.3 is vulnerable to Remote Code Execution via the parse_array function. Insufficient validation of the widget 'classes' map allows a plain-array payload to bypass the is_safe_widget_instance() object check and reach the callable-invocation sink in Element_Classes::parse_array(). This enables unauthenticated attackers to execute code on the server, provided comments are enabled on tribe_events posts and at least one comment containing a crafted wp:legacy-widget block has been submitted.
- CVE-2026-78006Critical
The Events Calendar plugin for WordPress in all versions up to and including 6.17.4 is vulnerable to Remote Code Execution via the is_safe_widget_instance function. Insufficient protection in is_safe_widget_instance can be bypassed because PHP fires magic methods during its pre-parse, combined with enable_rendering_widget_copied() forging a valid wp_hash integrity attribute before unserialize() is reached. This enables unauthenticated attackers to execute code on the server, as the plugin's V2 single-event template runs do_blocks() over buffered comment HTML and WordPress returns a moderation-hash URL allowing an unauthenticated commenter to immediately view their own pending comment.
- CVE-2026-85681Critical
The WP Component WordPress plugin through 2.2.4 does not have any capability or nonce checks on one of the actions it makes available to unauthenticated users, and it takes both the option name and the option value from the request, allowing unauthenticated attackers to overwrite any of the site's options. On a single site installation this leads to a full takeover, as registration can be enabled with a default role of administrator.
- CVE-2026-84171Critical
The WP images upload on piclect WordPress plugin through 1.0 does not validate the name or type of uploaded files before writing them to a publicly accessible directory, allowing unauthenticated attackers to upload arbitrary files and execute arbitrary code on the server.
- CVE-2026-82845Critical
The Masteriyo LMS WordPress plugin before 3.4.1 does not prevent user-supplied values held as metadata from being deserialized when they are read back, allowing users with a minimal account to inject arbitrary PHP objects and, by way of a class shipped in a library bundled with the plugin, write and execute arbitrary code on the server. A weaker form of the same issue is reachable without an account and yields an arbitrary file write rather than code execution.
- CVE-2026-81402Critical
The DS Ad Rotator WordPress plugin through 0.8 does not perform any capability check, nonce verification, or file-type validation on its image upload handler, allowing unauthenticated attackers to upload arbitrary files, including PHP, to a web-accessible directory, which can lead to remote code execution.
- CVE-2026-77006Critical
The WebTotem Backups WordPress plugin through 1.0.1 does not validate a user-supplied file path, does not check the capability of the user making the request, and discards the result of its own CSRF check, allowing any authenticated user, such as a subscriber, to delete arbitrary files on the server, which can lead to a site takeover.
- CVE-2026-77005Critical
The CODE MONKEYS PROPOSALS WordPress plugin through 1.0.1 does not validate a user-supplied file path before deleting a file, and does not check the capability of the user making the request, allowing any authenticated user, such as a subscriber, to delete arbitrary files on the server, which can lead to a site takeover.
- CVE-2026-75800Critical
The Frontegg SAML SSO WordPress plugin through 1.0.1 does not verify the signature or issuer of SAML authentication responses before establishing a session, allowing unauthenticated attackers to log in as any user, including administrators, as well as to create arbitrary accounts.
- CVE-2026-87719Critical
GitLab EE versions from 18.3 before 19.1.8, 19.2 before 19.2.6, and 19.3 before 19.3.2 contain a vulnerability that, under certain conditions, allows an authenticated user with Duo Chat access to obtain Advanced Search instance configurations and sensitive credentials. Exploitation uses a specially crafted GraphQL subscription argument to bypass serialization and perform server object lookup.
Original NVD description (English source)
The example example_xcom that was included in airflow documentation implemented unsafe pattern of reading value from xcom in the way that could be exploited to allow UI user who had access to modify XComs to perform arbitrary execution of code on the worker. Since the UI users are already highly trusted, this is a Low severity vulnerability. It does not affect Airflow release - example_dags are not supposed to be enabled in production environment, however users following the example could replicate the bad pattern. Documentation of Airflow 3.2.0 contains version of the example with improved resiliance for that case. Users who followed that pattern are advised to adjust their implementations accordingly.

