CVE-2024-6834
CriticalSummary
Podatność w APIML Spring Cloud Gateway wykorzystuje uprawnienia użytkownika poprzez nieoczekiwane podpisywanie żądania proxy przez certyfikat klienta Zowe. Umożliwia to dostęp do punktów końcowych wymagających wewnętrznego certyfikatu klienta bez potrzeby posiadania jakichkolwiek poświadczeń.
Risk Assessment
Może to prowadzić do zarządzania komponentami oraz umożliwić atakującemu przejęcie całej komunikacji, w tym poświadczeń użytkowników, co stanowi poważne zagrożenie dla bezpieczeństwa organizacji.
Recommendation
Zaleca się przegląd i aktualizację konfiguracji APIML Spring Cloud Gateway oraz wdrożenie dodatkowych mechanizmów uwierzytelniania, aby zabezpieczyć dostęp do wrażliwych punktów końcowych.
Related vulnerabilities
- CVE-2026-75430Critical
PowerJob Worker version 5.1.2 (and likely earlier versions) exposes the /worker/deployContainer HTTP endpoint without authentication on the default transport port, allowing a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code.
- CVE-2026-75431Critical
PowerJob Server version 5.1.2 (and likely earlier) uses a predictable JWT signing key for HS256-based authentication, allowing a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code.
- CVE-2026-44402Critical
Voltronic Power SNMP Web Pro 1.1 contains an unauthenticated remote code execution vulnerability in the upload.cgi firmware update endpoint, allowing remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands as root by uploading a crafted tar archive.
- CVE-2026-19274Critical
IBM Observability with Instana (Agent) Build 1.0.303 through 1.0.323 IBM Instana Agent Operator could allow an authenticated Kubernetes tenant to hijack or permanently destroy another tenant's cluster-level RBAC permissions, caused by cluster-scoped RBAC objects keyed solely by the bare CR name with no namespace disambiguation.
- CVE-2026-18658Critical
IBM Operational Decision Manager 9.6.0.0, 9.5.0.0, 8.11.1.0, 8.11.0.1, 8.12.0.1, 9.5.0.1, and 9.0.0.1 is vulnerable to SQL injection. An unauthenticated attacker can execute arbitrary SQL statements and leverage database functionality to write a web shell to the application web root, resulting in remote code execution.
- CVE-2026-85696Critical
SadTalker contains an OS command injection vulnerability in the video muxing process where uploaded audio filenames are interpolated into ffmpeg commands without proper escaping. Attackers can upload audio files with shell metacharacters in the filename to break out of quoted arguments and execute arbitrary system commands when video generation occurs.
- CVE-2026-85695Critical
FastChat contains an authentication bypass vulnerability in the /register_worker endpoint that allows unauthenticated attackers to register arbitrary worker addresses and perform server-side request forgery. Attackers can register malicious workers under victim model names to intercept user prompts, images, and responses, or probe internal network ports.
- CVE-2026-85688Critical
TEN Framework 0.11.71 contains unauthenticated arbitrary file read and write vulnerabilities in the TMAN Designer file-content API endpoints. Attackers can submit POST and PUT requests to read arbitrary files or write malicious content to system paths, enabling code execution.
- CVE-2026-85684Critical
marker through 2.0.0 contains a path traversal vulnerability in the FastAPI /marker/upload handler that fails to sanitize the file.filename parameter. Unauthenticated attackers can supply filenames with directory traversal sequences to write arbitrary files or delete existing files.
- CVE-2026-85672Critical
zerox 1.1.20 contains an OS command injection vulnerability in the file download mechanism where the temporary file extension derived from document URLs is interpolated unsanitized into shell commands. Attackers can craft URLs with malicious extensions to execute arbitrary OS commands.
Original NVD description (English source)
A vulnerability in APIML Spring Cloud Gateway which leverages user privileges by unexpected signing proxied request by Zowe's client certificate. This allows access to a user to the endpoints requiring an internal client certificate without any credentials. It could lead to managing components in there and allow an attacker to handle the whole communication including user credentials.

