CVE Vulnerability Catalog

IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 px-runtime could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary commands due to improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS command.

IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 contains an OS command injection vulnerability that allows a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary commands.

GNU Emacs 28.1 through 31.1 allows arbitrary code execution upon opening a file, because an untrusted value of read-symbol-shorthands affects the intern and unintern functions. This affects the default configuration; no particular user settings are required to trigger it.

Vaultwarden through 1.37.3 omits organization membership status validation from three cipher access-restriction queries, allowing revoked and not-yet-confirmed members to retain read, write, delete, and attachment access to organization ciphers.

Improper validation of the Destination Connection ID length in s2n-quic 1.88.0 and earlier may allow an unauthenticated remote user to cause a denial of service by shutting down a server endpoint via a single crafted UDP datagram. Only server endpoints specifically configured to send Retry packets are affected.

lwIP (Lightweight IP) has a double free vulnerability, which could crash the system, cause a DoS, memory corruption, or allow code execution on the victim system.

Unleash prior to 8.0.3 contains five authorization vulnerabilities in the admin API that allow authenticated users to modify segment assignments, disclose cross-project variant, strategy, and environment information, and modify tags across projects without proper permissions.

openEQUELLA before 2026.1.0 contains an authenticated remote code execution vulnerability that allows any authenticated non-guest user to execute arbitrary code by exploiting Java deserialization in the HTTP invoker endpoint at /invoker/*. Attackers can bypass the class-name denylist by nesting a serialized payload inside a java.security.SignedObject.

A local cross-user code execution vulnerability exists in GNU wget (Windows builds from eternallybored.org) due to a hardcoded configuration file path (C:\msys64) that is writable by unprivileged users, allowing for arbitrary code execution via the use_askpass directive, potentially allowing local privilege escalation.

The Apache Lounge Windows distribution of Apache HTTP Server build contains a hardcoded configuration path vulnerability within openssl.cnf path that can allow local code execution.

An unrestricted upload of files with a dangerous type in the thumbnail-upload endpoint (/index.php?m=member&f=article&v=thumbUpload) of WuzhiCMS 5.0.0 allows an authenticated low-privileged member to upload a crafted .php file and execute arbitrary PHP code on the server.

CMSimple 5.24 ships with CSRF protection disabled by default, which turns csrfProtection() into a no-op on every state-changing admin request, and it does not send the csrf_token hidden field in admin forms. Because administrator authentication is cookie-only and no CSRF token is enforced, an unauthenticated attacker can induce a logged-in administrator's browser to issue a forged content-save request with a text payload containing a scripting marker. The marker is stored verbatim into content/content.php; on every subsequent page view evaluate_cmsimple_scripting() (functions.php) executes the marker body with PHP eval() — for all visitors, including unauthenticated ones. This yields persistent remote code execution on the web server.

An out-of-bounds read vulnerability exists in the schema lexer of flatcc 4c3b999e. When an exact-length FlatBuffers schema ends with an unterminated quotation mark, the C-string scanning logic in lex() dereferences the input pointer after it has reached the end of the buffer. A specially crafted schema can trigger a one-byte heap buffer over-read, resulting in application crash and denial of service.

An out-of-bounds read vulnerability exists in the schema lexer of flatcc 4c3b999e. When an exact-length FlatBuffers schema buffer ends with a digit, the integer digit-scan loop in lex() advances past the end of the input buffer and dereferences the out-of-bounds pointer. A specially crafted schema can trigger a one-byte heap buffer over-read, resulting in application crash and denial of service.

An invalid pointer release vulnerability exists in YARA 4.5.8 during deserialization of compiled .yrc rule files. The vulnerability is caused by insufficient validation of external-variable pointers, which may lead to invalid free in yr_rules_destroy() or wild pointer access in yr_object_create(). An attacker can provide a specially crafted .yrc file that causes memory corruption and application crash.

SIPGO prior to 1.4.3 contains a vulnerability in WSConnection.Read that does not set MaxFrameSize, allowing an unauthenticated WS or WSS peer to send a frame header declaring an extremely large payload, causing an oversized allocation or a makeslice length panic and crashing or exhausting memory in the server process.

A vulnerability in an administrative component of Analytics and Location Engine (ALE) is vulnerable to a man-in-the-middle (MitM) attack. Successful exploitation could allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to execute arbitrary code with root privileges on the affected appliance.

Vulnerabilities in the Analytics and Location Engine web interface allow remote authenticated users to run arbitrary commands on the underlying host. A successful exploit could allow an attacker to execute arbitrary commands as root on the underlying operating system leading to complete system compromise.

A vulnerability exists in the maintenance restore functionality of Analytics and Location Engine (ALE). Successful exploitation of this vulnerability could allow an authenticated remote attacker to gain unauthorized access to the file system with root privileges, potentially resulting in full system compromise.

A vulnerability exists in the Analytics and Location Engine (ALE) that may allow for unauthorized access, information disclosure, or denial of service. An unauthenticated remote attacker could exploit the vulnerable system by sending specially crafted input or intercepting network communications. Successful exploitation could result in the disclosure of sensitive information, bypass of security controls, or a denial of service condition on the affected system.